September 20, 2017
Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation observes International Day of Peace
The Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation (CSVR) is joining citizens and organisations globally to observe International Day of Peace on September 21 with a call to renew efforts for peacebuilding.
The theme for International Day of Peace 2017, on Thursday September 21, is Together for Peace: Respect, Safety and Dignity for All by the United Nations.
CSVR aims to use its expertise in building reconciliation, democracy and a human rights culture and in preventing violence in South Africa and other countries in Africa.
“Our work toward achieving sustainable peace can be seen through the Innovations in Peacebuilding Initiative,” said Masana Ndinga-Kanga, research manager at CSVR.
The two-year research, dialogue and policy project explores innovative ways in which international organisations, donors, governments and local non-governmental organisations conduct activities aimed at conflict prevention and management, peacebuilding and reconciliation.
Over the past year, CSVR has hosted peacebuilding workshops in partnership with the Josef Korbel School of International Studies, University of Denver, the Chr. Michelsen Institute (CMI) in Norway, and the Nepal Peacebuilding Initiative (NPI).
“The workshops are aimed at understanding how peace is built in local communities and around particular key community priorities. How civil society uses international norms helps us understand links between what happens in these local spaces and the global agenda promoted by the UN and international community,” she said. “International Peace needs to be built through and experiences as local peace.”
Case studies of local peacebuilding include Khayelitsha and conflicts over the right to sanitation, #FeesMustFall and the right to decolonised higher education, the Community Works Programme and the right to work, the right to reparations for victims of apartheid and women’s rights in democratic South Africa.
Other programmes run by CSVR are:Community Intervention Programme – through the programme, CSVR is able to directly engage with people affected by violence and conflict. Clinical Intervention – which offers psychosocial counselling support to survivors of violence and conflict, who are willing to engage in the counselling process. Advocacy – which was established to influence policy and institutional development at local, national, regional and international levels. Research – which studies, analyses and generates knowledge on violence and conflict. Learning and Knowledge Management – which allows the organisation to constantly learn from its work and share knowledge with its partners and the public.
After a series of practitioner workshops in South African, researchers from the project will now be sharing lessons from these processes with peacebuilders and policy makers in New York and Oslo.
Read CSVR publications on http://www.csvr.org.za/publications/latest-publications
Issued by the Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation.
For more information and interviews, contact:
Tel: +27 11 888 0140
Cell: +27 79 713 5953
Industry experts converge at peacebuilding seminar
Leading researchers, practitioners, and policymakers working in post-conflict peacebuilding, met in South Africa under the auspices of the University of Denver, the Chr. Michelsen Institute, the Nepal Peacebuilding Initiative, and the Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation (CSVR) to discuss new strategies for working in conflict areas.
Collectively representative partners from the global South took into consideration the nature and dynamics that underpin international human rights frameworks and their effect on preventing or exacerbating tensions at the local government level in these regions.
The project, which targeted at a number of international bodies like the United Nations, highlights that local actors often adapt or reject international norms in the face of unresponsive local governments – because these norms are seen to be too vague and impractical to the needs of local communities.
CSVR Research Manager Masana Ndinga-Kanga says the project will also look at various local case studies for South Africa: “These case studies show that while international norms have been incorporated into the South African legal and policy framework, work still needs to be done around localization and delivering socioeconomic and political rights.”
The failures at the local government level, says Ndinga-Kanga, further contribute to undermining sustainable peace in South Africa because the legal framework, such as the constitution, provide for certain rights but implementation in an unequal and sometimes problematic manner contribute to frustration in communities.
The five local case studies include:Khayelitsha and the sanitation wars over the right to sanitation, #FeesMustFall and the right to decolonized higher education, the Community Works Program and the right to work, the right to reparations for victims of apartheid and women’s rights in democratic South Africa.
The “Innovations in Peacebuilding" workshop in March also aimed to share and draw lessons learned on rights-based peacebuilding in conflict-affected countries with other studies from the Americas, Asia, Kenya and Rwanda. It also aims to understand how international norms can work better for sustainable peace given what emerges on how local actors adopt, adapt or reject international norms.
Speakers included Timothy Sisk, Professor of International and Comparative Politics (Denver University); Peter Kagwanja, Kenyan intellectual and expert on security, governance and strategic issues (Africa Policy Institute); Lizwe Jamela, Human Rights Lawyer (Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights); Astri Suhrke, Senior Researcher at the Chr. Michelsen Institute (Norway); Kudzai Makombe, Deputy Director of the Bilateral Programmes and Partner Relations (Southern Africa); and Hugo van der Merwe, Director of Research (CSVR).
To see a short video with highlights from the Innovations in Peacebuilding seminar, see below:
“Innovations in Peacebuilding” is a two-year research, dialogue, and policy project that explores innovative ways in which international organizations, donors, governments, and local non-governmental organizations conduct activities aimed at conflict prevention and management, peacebuilding and reconciliation.
CSVR calls on SA to honour Rwanda Genocide victims through a commitment to peacebuildingPRESS STATEMENT | APRIL 7, 2017
The Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation (CSVR) calls on South Africans to commemorate the 23rd Anniversary of the Rwandan Genocide with a renewed commitment to peaceful political engagement, as well as a commitment to the human rights of all who live in South Africa.
CSVR’s work on transitional justice and trauma intervention has long identified the devastating and long-term consequences of political conflict, mass violence and state repression on post conflict societies. The experience of Rwanda reverberates with South Africans because of the commonalities in the challenges faced in reconstructing a country after mass violations, and the emergence of peace in the same historic year of 1994.
The 1994 Rwanda genocide left hundreds of thousands dead and many others in exile in neighbouring countries. In three months - from April to July 1994 - nearly a million Tutsis and sympathetic Hutus were massacred. Systematic rape was also used as a tool of genocide by the state. We must honour the memory of those who died and the survivors of these atrocities by learning from these events. We must be mindful of not walking the same path. We must also learn from the challenges faced by such a nation when dealing with this legacy.
In our intervention work and research with survivors of torture and state repression, CSVR has heard first-hand reports of the trauma of the Rwandan genocide. These stories affect us very directly as South Africans. We urge South Africans to recognise that we too must come to terms with our past and acknowledge the very stark legacy of our apartheid history and also recognise the hidden impact of suppressed trauma from our centuries of conflict and exploitation. Not addressing these directly will only feed the unresolved anger and mistrust that fuels our violent interpersonal and political conflicts.
We must ensure that those who were victims of violence are able to speak out, have their pain recognised and their healing supported. We must also ensure that the underlying causes of these conflicts are seriously and urgently addressed, and not left to fuel continued cycles of violence.
Last week, CSVR brought together leading local, continental and international experts working on innovations in peacebuilding to discuss new strategies for working in deeply divided societies. A key lesson we learned is that while international human rights norms have been incorporated into the South African legal and policy framework, effective solutions are only found when local activists are able to draw strength from these new tools to craft interventions, policies and initiatives that directly address their communities’ immediate livelihood needs. South Africa provides many inspiring examples of such innovation, and these present a critical safeguard against future violence and repression.
It is critical that we now place this acknowledgement of our legacy, its unresolved roots and emotional scars, and the recognition of the role played by local peacebuilding innovation in healing and protecting our society on the national agenda.
14 July 2016
Pretoria, South Africa – As South Africa prepares for local government elections on 3 August, we urge government to take decisive action to prevent violent protests, says the Coalition Against Violence.
MEMBERS of Parliament’s police committee, the new Deputy Minister of Police Maggie Sotyu and police secretariat officials pronounced themselves disappointed this week when the Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation’s report on why crime in South Africa is so violent was released.
They clearly all wanted a magic wand from the academics – David Bruce and Adele Kirsten – who compiled the study, and there wasn’t one. Indeed, after a particularly robust engagement, Bruce told the committee that worldwide there had been many studies done on violent crime and no one had yet come up with an answer.
Committee chairman Sindi Chikunga and Freedom Front Plus MP Pieter Groenewald wanted to know why crime in South Africa was so often accompanied by hideous cruelty. They said the study had failed to find an explanation as to why victims of crime are so often tortured.Indeed, this is a good question. The study reported that the history of structural violence inherent in the way in which colonialism and apartheid worked lay at the heart of the matter.
I suppose the idea is that if you are the victim of institutional violence simply because of your race then it legitimises violence on a personal level.Also, people would have observed brutal state action from police and other departments where there were no consequences. In short, impunity.Also connected to violent crime in the study were things like poverty, education, the destruction of family structures through the migrant labour system and, curiously, the abuse of alcohol by young mothers – often accompanied by domestic violence. Still further reinforcement.
While accepting the bona fides of the research done, it would be nice if the further research which the CSVR said was ongoing could provide answers to some of the questions. For example, there are places in the world where there is far more poverty than in South Africa but where there is less violent crime.It would also be interesting to find out what role is played by the fact that South Africa negotiated its revolution rather than fighting to the end. Is there a sort of feeling that violence is justified because there were no real winners and losers in the revolution?
There were some startling findings which should sound some alarm bells, one being that more than a third of the perpetrators of violent crime are 19 years and younger. That is truly scary and it points to problems with education and socialisation.
Having said all that, the criticism of the report does seem to be unfair. It is an astonishing piece of work and really does serve the vital function of bringing together what we know about violent crime in the country and putting it in an accessible form in one place.
There have also been complaints that R3.5- million of public money was spent and not much achieved. Also unfair. Anything that contributes to a better understanding of where we are and why we behave as we do is worth every cent.
In The Herald
Johannesburg - South Africa's "gender machinery" is in "disarray" with it not even being clear who is co-ordinating the 16 Days of Activism campaign, a group of NGOs said on Wednesday.
"At a time when it is most needed, participants noted, the national gender machinery is in disarray," read a statement from Gender Links and the Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation (CSVR).
"There is a lack of clarity on which agency is driving the 16 Days of Activism campaign, which used to be housed in the department of local government, following the establishment of the ministry of women, children and disability in April this year.
"The ministry has yet to hold a consultation with civil society organisations. There has also been a deafening silence on the status of the 365 National Action Plan to End Gender Violence adopted in March 2007 and co-ordinated by the National Prosecution Authority (NPA)."
They said there is also still no specific "domestic violence" category which would enable monitoring of the crime. They called on the government to resuscitate the 365 Day National Action Plan to End Gender Violence.
'We can prevent violence'
Their statement followed a three-day symposium convened by the CSVR under the banner "We can Prevent Violence". They also called for the establishment of a special fund to end gender violence, in line with regional and international commitments.
In addition they called on Fifa to use the World Cup 2010 to send out strong messages in support of the campaign to end gender violence as well as HIV/Aids.
They said the 12% increase in reported rape cases to 71 500 from April 1, 2008 to March 31, 2009 may in part be due to the expanded definition of rape under the new act. The figures are unacceptably high and likely to be understated due to under reporting.
Government was also still "well behind" in reaching the target of 81 one-stop centres for addressing gender violence by 2010 provided for in the National Sexual Assault Policy.
The 16-Days campaign takes place every year from November 25, the International Day of No Violence Against Women.
It runs until December 10, which is International Human Rights Day.
Is he an astute politician who speaks to ordinary people's concerns, or a dangerous populist who may be undermining the Constitution? Jacob Zuma's controversial remarks on the pre-election campaign trail that has taken him around the country have left in their wake a number of questions - and while his comments may have hit the right spot with his audiences, constitutional experts and gender rights activists are not amused. The ANC president told a rally in the Western Cape last weekend that truant learners and pregnant teenagers "should be caught and sent to faraway boarding schools by force until they get degrees".
He accused teenaged mothers of abusing the government's child grant and talked about "a war on street kids". He also repeated previous remarks, including one that crime suspects enjoy too many privileges. But since he sensationally pronounced last year that he was willing to reconsider the death penalty, there has been little indication of how he wants to get this past the country's progressive human rights Constitution. The man is certainly playing to his audiences across South Africa's deep social divides. His allegorical, vernacular rally style contrasts sharply with his measured and reasonable utterances last week at the Cape Town Press Club, where his audience was a world apart from the mostly poverty-stricken people who turn up at rallies. Constitutional and human rights experts believe Zuma's campaign approach to be "dangerous" and "populist", one that's testing the limits of the country's Constitution. Some are incensed by Zuma's suggestion that teenaged mothers should be separated from their babies. "There is a complete lack of acknowledgement of the responsibility of the father in any of this. Teenage girls are a nice, easy cheap target and it plays to a conservative populism to bash teenage girls," is the verdict of Lisa Vetten, senior researcher at the Tshwaranang Legal Advocacy Centre to End Violence Against Women. "Frankly, for the ANC Youth League to have not said anything about this either, just goes to show how much they care about the difficulties that face adolescent girls. Why girls fall pregnant is a lot more complicated than we think." Two legal commentators say they believe aspects of Zuma's statements may be in conflict with the country's Constitution. University of the Western Cape constitutional expert, Professor Pierre de Vos, says if Zuma indeed meant that women should be forcibly sent away for education, he was making them into "criminals" when they were not accused before the law - "even more grave if it is directed at pregnant women". "It is obviously preposterous, because you once again make women the scapegoats and the men (who made them pregnant) get away scot-free. It is the old patriarchal approach," said De Vos. While acknowledging that the scope of teenage pregnancies was a shame to society, Unisa's Professor Shadrack Gutto said the ANC president's solution was not necessarily "child friendly", did not address the root causes of the problem and "from a constitutional legal perspective (was) very problematic". "As a safeguard you should build in the question of development of children," suggests Gutto. "In legal terms, the interests of the child (babies) come first, and critical to that is the interests of the child, for instance, in breastfeeding. "We know breastfeeding is universally acknowledged to be better for the child than other forms of feeding (although) other forms are not necessarily bad for the child." He said in this context, the statement "could violate the constitutional principle of protecting the rights of children" even before considering the interests of the mother. From the child's point of view "the statements are unfortunate and in many ways opposite to the principles of law". "We need proper reflection really on this issue - which is a populist statement not properly thought through," he suggested. But ANC national spokesperson Carl Niehaus believes Zuma has been misunderstood. The comments - often mistranslated - are derived from listening to communities where the problem of teenage pregnancies "means that mothers and grannies then have to look after the children of their children" and teenage mothers are stigmatised. Niehaus said Zuma was merely raising real concerns in communities that beg for a response from the government. He said that when teenagers leave a community to give birth, they are seldom welcomed back "because there is a kind of social sanction". "It is first of all not an attitude to let men walk off scot-free. It is important that young men are also kept responsible. The suggestion is not at all to withdraw the children by force, but where possible for them to be taken into a new community where they will be able to grow with the children," he explained. On the ANC president's statements that the rights of criminals should be curtailed, experts argue that this will not solve the underlying problem of weak judicial and police systems that result in offenders walking free. But what it does do is infringe on people's constitutional rights. The constitutional legal basic rights of all persons have limitations, stresses Gutto. "But then to be saying criminals should not have rights, really the ANC president is speaking in a language (that) I think is contrary to our Constitution and the principles of the right to freedom of movement and the rights of expression and freedom of association, which will be severely limited." Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation's senior researcher David Bruce says that while there's evidence that a control-orientated approach to criminal justice is likely to convict more criminals, it also comes at the cost of convicting higher numbers of people who are innocent. Bruce warns that a human rights approach, however, depends on a criminal justice system which is staffed by people who are highly skilled and knowledgeable. South Africa has been struggling to get this right, but all efforts must be exhausted before we start intruding on human rights, he stressed. "Incarceration is a process which brutalises people. We are living in a country that is already severely brutalised. So we need to be very wary of it," he said. De Vos says it's a "typical politician's quick-fix" answer to complex problems in our deeply unequal society. But Niehaus stressed that Zuma had been trying to respond to communities' serious battles against crime and to encourage discussion about whether this could be dealt with "in a tougher way without transgressing the Constitution". Gutto also acknowledges the flip-side - that South Africa offers little for victims of crime. "If you put all those together, you can see where the sentiment is coming from - but the ANC president should not be speaking so loosely." Niehaus denied Zuma was being populist. "It is more about being sensitive to the issues being raised in townships and rural communities where things are really difficult. "These are really issues that I think he is quite right to raise," he stressed.This article was originally published on page 17 of Cape Argus on November 14, 2008
There was no need for court action to force the Gauteng provincial government to keep open temporary safe sites for refugees and asylum seekers until they were reintegrated into communities, spokesperson Thabo Masebe said on Monday. He was reacting to the announcement that the Wits Law Clinic and Consortium for Refugees and Migrants in South Africa (CoRMSA) were bringing an urgent application in the Pretoria High Court. They want the government ordered to communicate and implement a reintegration strategy which protects the rights of all, and to restore and not dismantle the Rifle Range temporary safe site until the reintegration strategy is in place.
"I don't know really what these people are looking for," said Masebe. There was no need for them to take court action, he said. "All they had to do was come to us." More than 62 people died, hundreds were injured and tens of thousands displaced in a wave of xenophobic attacks which started in Alexandra, Johannesburg on May 12 and spread to the rest of the country. The displaced have been housed in temporary shelters set up throughout the province since then. "All the shelters are still open, including the Rifle Range shelter," said Masebe. However, he explained that when people left any of the shelters any excess tents were folded up. Of about 1 700 refugees and asylum seekers at the Rifle Range camp at the height of the crisis, only 250 remained, he said. The rest had left after refusing to accept temporary identity cards from the Department of Home Affairs or finding alternative accommodation in their communities. Elsewhere in the province, there were still about 3 000 occupants of the safe shelters. "It's going down because people are leaving every day," he said, adding that 10 families left the Rand Airport camp on Friday alone. The government's key role had been to create conditions in all communities - starting with those where there was violence - for people to return to their homes, Masebe said. "They should be safe to do so. They should not fear that somebody will attack them again," he said. This had involved talking to the communities, which the provincial government had started in May. "It's not something that starts and stops. It starts and continues," he said. "I don't know what plan they are looking for." Civil society organisations have come out in support of the court action. While the need for legal action was regrettable, it was needed in the absence of the government's formal communication on a reintegration strategy, said the Reintegration Working Group. The group includes representatives of, among others: the Anglican Diocese of Johannesburg; the Somali Community Board; the Refugee Ministries Centre; the Coalition Against Xenophobia; His People Church; the Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation; Mthwakazi Arts and Culture; and the Salvation Army. Masebe said the various groups could assist the government as political organisations and community organisations had done from the start. "That process goes on." In addition, the provincial government was talking to displaced people still at the shelters and who could not reintegrate on their own to find out what kind of help they needed. This included assistance with the building of shacks destroyed in the violence - in Ekurhuleni, communities were already helping in rebuilding efforts - or finding alternative accommodation. "There is no way as government, there is no way we are going to keep the shelters on a permanent basis.". The government did not want to create as permanent, separate settlements for foreign nationals, he said, adding that the government would oppose the court action. "It is not properly informed." - Sapa
In the Independent Online
Police corruption is likely to skyrocket if the Scorpions are closed down, the Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation (CSVR) stated in a submission to parliament. "The SAPS is already riddled with corruption and is very bad at addressing the issue," CSVR senior researcher David Bruce argued. He said that corruption within the service could only be properly addressed if investigating units, with the "investigative sophistication" of the Scorpions, were allowed to remain independent of the police. The CSVR submission is but one of many which the chairperson of the National Assembly's Safety and Security Committee, Maggie Sotyu, expects to be waiting for her when she return to parliament next Tuesday.
The public has until Monday to make submissions concerning their views on whether the Directorate of Special Operations (Scorpions) should be closed and merged into the SAPS as called for by ANC resolutions passed at its December conference. The CSVR said that while it recognised that there were problems with the way the Scorpions were managed - as highlighted in the Khampepe Commission's report - these should be addressed without dissolving the unit. Closing the unit would do nothing to reduce the risk of the state abusing its power in the future by using similar units for its own political gain, the CSVR argued. "Creating a single agency with a monopoly of investigative powers is more likely to accentuate the problem," the CSVR said. Groups within the ANC along with the ANC's alliance partners have accused President Thabo Mbeki of using the Scorpions to carry out his political agenda against ANC leader Jacob Zuma. Meanwhile the Centre For Constitutional Rights (CFCR) on Wednesday described cabinet's decision to close the Scorpions as "irrational and arbitrary". It added it had a duty to draw attention to "conduct inconsistent with the constitution".This article was originally published on page 3 of Pretoria News on July 24, 2008
Brian Indrelunas The government should meet its "international obligation" to criminalise torture, says SA Human Rights commissioner Leon Wessels. He called explicitly outlawing torture "an international obligation" after speaking to representatives of non-profit groups and government departments at a seminar. "We can't just subscribe to the international rhetoric (without) ensuring that torture becomes a statutory crime," he commented. The Constitution lists the right not to be tortured and police policies refer to torture specifically, but "all other policy is devoid of the language", said Lukas Muntingh of the Civil Society Prison Reform Initiative. CSPRI and the Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation (CSVR) hosted on Tuesday's seminar, which explored civil society's role in preventing torture.
Published on iol.co.za
Kambala.O. (2017). Benchmarking the Role of African Youth in Transitional Processes.
Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation and Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights. 2013. Returning to one another: Easing engagement about things that matter: A treasure trove of ideas and exercises to build community and hold conversations that matter. Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation and Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights: Johannesburg.
Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation and Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights. 2013. At the confluence: Where human rights and conflict transformation meet: A selection of content and exercises that explore working at the confluence of human rights and conflict transformation. Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation and Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights: Johannesburg.
Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation and Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights. 2013. Framed! How the human rights framework shapes our engagements: A treasure trove of ideas and exercises to explore the framework that human rights offers. Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation and Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights: Johannesburg.
Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation and Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights. 2013. When spider webs unite they can tie up a lion: A treasure trove of ideas and excercises for spinning a web of enhanced relationships. Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation and Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights: Johannesburg.
Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation and Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights. 2013. What lies beyond? Delving below the surface of conflict: A treasure trove of exercises, tools and perspectives on transforming conflict and how we relate to it. Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation and Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights: Johannesburg.
Bantjes, Megan. 2011. How others have done it: A desk study of community projects related to torture, Appendix C. Johannesburg: Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation.With the aim of informing CSVR's development of a community work model to address torture and cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment, this desk study examines six community projects conducted in South Africa and in other countries. Details of four of the interventions were found in the literature and information about two projects was gathered in interviews with the staff involved. Each intervention is discussed in terms of six questions that have been found useful for thinking about community work (see Questions about community work, Appendix B). The objectives of CSVR’s community work on torture - transformation, prevention and amelioration - provide the framework for considering the implications of each of these projects for CSVR's development of a model.
Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation (2011). African Union Commission Consultation with African Union Member States on Transitional Justice. Consultation Report: Cape Town, South Africa. 12-13 September 2011.